Understanding Findings
The results screen is three columns: the document in the middle, the findings rail on the right, and, when you open it, the Assistant beyond that. The header runs across the top. Both side panels are collapsible and resizable, and the document never moves when you open or close one.
Each review covers one document. If you selected several files, each has its own results screen, and the batch as a whole has a cross-document matrix.
The results screen
The document sits on the left under its lens tabs. The findings rail on the right is where a review is actually worked.
The session header
| Control | Where | What it does |
|---|---|---|
| Back | Far left | Returns to wherever you came from: the jobs list, the home screen, or the batch matrix |
| Document review and the file name | Left of the badges | Names the feature and the document under review |
| Origin badge | Badges | How the checks were chosen: Smart suggested, Custom or Template |
| Compliance badge | Badges | Reads as a percentage followed by "compliant". Its tooltip: "Share of configured checks the document satisfied." Absent on reviews that were never scored |
| From Drafting / From Review Matrix | Badges | The document came from another Judicio run. Click to open it. Its Back returns here |
| Jurisdiction pill | Badges | The jurisdiction this run was stamped with |
| Stat pills | Badges | The file count, the total findings, and the pending, resolved and flagged counts. Zero counts are not shown |
| Details icon | End of the badges | Hover for page count, template name and completion date |
| Share controls | Actions | Share the review, or transfer ownership. See Collaboration |
| Case strategy | Actions | Generates a case strategy from this document. Shown when the review has a source file |
| Save to Judicio | Actions | Saves the reviewed document back into your File Library. Disabled until at least one finding is reviewed |
| Assistant | Actions | Opens the Document Assistant rail |
| Export | Actions | Swaps the right rail for the export screen. Disabled until at least one finding is reviewed |
Notices above the header
Two kinds of banner can sit above the header, and both change how you should read the result.
- A section filter that matched nothing. Either the file has no outline, or none of the chosen headings appear in it. In both cases the whole document was reviewed.
- Incomplete coverage. Judicio says plainly when some checks ran against truncated or missing text, and adds the count of findings discarded because their quoted text could not be located. A clean result under this banner is an unverified one, not a clean document.
The document view switcher
Four tabs sit above the document. They are lenses on the same review, not different documents.
| Tab | What it shows |
|---|---|
| Original | The document exactly as uploaded. No analysis shown |
| Issues | The document with findings highlighted in place, with the finding count in the tab label. Nothing is changed. Click a highlight to see why it was flagged |
| Redline | Tracked changes: struck-through text is removed, underlined text is added |
| Clean copy | The revised document with every applied change, with changed text in green |
A one-line caption under the tabs restates what the active lens shows, so the meaning is always on screen rather than behind a hover.
The view controls
| Control | Where | When it appears | What it does |
|---|---|---|---|
| Highlight all | Right of the tabs | Issues and Redline | Off, only the selected finding is highlighted. On, every finding on the visible pages is highlighted at once |
| Source PDF / Hide source | Top right of the document panel | When the review has a source file | Opens the scanned original alongside, scroll-synced against the reviewed text |
| Findings | Top right of the document panel | Always, except while exporting | Opens and closes the findings rail |
| Edit / Editing | Second row, right | Redline only | Turns the redline into an editable document. See Resolving findings |
| Search icon | Second row, right | Except while exporting | Opens find-in-document. The editor carries its own copy of it |
Searching inside the document
The search icon, or Command-F (Control-F on Windows), opens a find bar over the document. Judicio takes over the shortcut because the browser's own find cannot see text that has not been scrolled into view.
Type to search. The bar shows the current match and the total, or No matches. Enter moves to the next match and Shift-Enter to the previous, and the up and down controls do the same. Escape, or the close control, dismisses the bar.
The findings rail
The rail is where a review is actually worked. It opens on Pending when anything is pending, and on Resolved when nothing is. When you clear the last pending finding it advances to Resolved on its own.
The four status tabs
| Tab | What it holds |
|---|---|
| Pending | Findings you have not acted on yet. Your queue |
| Needs verification | Findings that an independent check could not fully confirm, or that came back low-confidence |
| Flagged | Findings you set aside with a note |
| Resolved | Findings you fixed, edited or accepted |
Pending, Flagged and Resolved partition the list: every finding sits in exactly one. Needs verification is different. It is a lens across all three, so a finding can appear both there and in its own status tab. That is deliberate: the question it answers is "which of these can I not take at face value?", which is not a stage of the review.
Each tab carries its count in brackets. Needs verification shows its label alone when the rail is holding one page of a long review rather than all of it, because a number counted from one page would understate the lane.
Filtering and paging
| Control | Where | What it does |
|---|---|---|
| Risk dropdown | Right of the tabs | Filters to All risk, High risk, Medium risk or Low risk |
| Previous and Next | Foot of the rail | Page through a long review. The line between them reads the page number and the total findings matching your filters |
An empty Needs verification lane with no risk filter set says so as good news: every finding cleared the independent support check. Any other empty view offers the filters as the thing to change.
Bulk actions
When the current view holds pending findings, a bar sits above the list with the count and two buttons.
| Control | What it does | When it is disabled |
|---|---|---|
| Accept all pending | Accepts every pending finding your filters select | On Needs verification, with the reason on screen: these came back weakly supported or low-confidence, so accept them one at a time, after reading |
| Flag all pending | Flags them instead | Never on the verification lane. Flagging something unconfirmed is the conservative move |
If a risk filter is narrowing a long review, both buttons are withheld and the bar says how many of the matching findings are on screen and to clear the risk filter to act on all of them. The bar disappears once nothing is pending.
The finding card
Every card carries the same block: a title, badges, the description, and a footer.
The badges
| Badge | When it appears | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| High Risk / Medium Risk / Low Risk | Always | How serious the finding is. Read High Risk first |
| High conf., Med. conf. or Low conf., with the score | When the review scored its own confidence | The authoring model's self-assessment. High is 80 and above, medium 50 to 79, low below 50 |
| Partly supported | When an independent check found the cited text only partly carries the claim | Verify before relying on it |
| Needs verification | When an independent check could not confirm the finding follows from the text it cites | The quote is real. The conclusion drawn from it may not be |
| Clause absent | When the finding is about something missing | The finding legitimately carries no quote. There is nothing in the text to point at |
| Not applicable | When the check does not apply to this kind of document | Not a defect in the document |
| A structured value | When the check that produced the finding declared a typed answer | The answer as a pill. Format mismatch appears instead when the answer did not fit the declared shape |
Confidence and support are two different things, and the difference matters. Confidence is what the model that wrote the finding thought of its own work. Support is a second, independent verdict on whether the claim actually follows from the quoted text. A confident but unsupported finding is exactly the one to read yourself.
A supported verdict and an ordinary present clause carry no badge at all. Only the cases that should change what you do get one.
The footer
- A category tag, the kind of issue this is.
- Page number, followed by the page the clause sits on.
- The section reference, prefixed with a section mark, when the finding sits inside a named section.
- A map-pin icon with a line through it when Judicio has no coordinates for the clause. Overlays are unavailable, and View in document will scroll to the page only. It is suppressed for absent and not-applicable findings, which have no location by design.
The status corner
An untouched finding reads Review pending. A finding you have acted on reads Reviewed, with a second badge naming how: AI fix, Manual edit, Accepted or Flagged.
The Assistant
Assistant in the header opens the Document Assistant on the far right. Its Chat tab answers questions about this document and its findings, with citations you can click back into the document or into the finding they came from. The composer's placeholder is "Ask about this document…", and it opens with suggested questions such as the highest-risk findings and which checks did not apply.